On the Shortness of Life translated by John W. Basore, Loeb Classical Library London:
It is not, has never been, nor will ever be, a Wikipedia policy or guideline. Rather, it illustrates standards or conduct that are generally not accepted by the Wikipedia community. Some discussions are born lame; some achieve lameness; some have lameness thrust upon them.
Upon coming across a discussion that is borderline lame, some Wikipedians may be tempted to go do something useful. This is a big mistake.
Left to its own devices, the discussion might inadvertently become useful. It is essential that as many editors as possible chime in, not adding to the discussion at hand, but merely commenting how lame it is and what a big waste of time it is. See Self-fulfilling prophecyPositive feedbackand Exponential growth.
Merely stating the discussion is lame is frequently not sufficient; every opposing statement must be denied with increasingly vehement assertions of the lameness. While at first blush, wasting time whining about what a waste of time something is may seem illogical, the inherent irony just magnifies the lameness.
An additional step to increase lameness is to include repeated links to this essay, which is WP: The best way to set about a lame edit war is to change a large number of articles based on your interpretation of minutiae in the manual of style.
If this does not work, try changing the MOS itself; that always works. Guidelines on how to add an entry to this guide If you want to add a "lame edit war" to this page, keep the following in mind: It must have been an actual edit war.
Discussions on talk pages, even over trivially lame details, are not "edit wars" and should NEVER be added: Note that pithy quotes on talk pages may be suitable for Wikipedia: It should truly be amongst the lamest edit wars.
Not just garden-variety lame. Unless a participant is banned for their part in the edit war, do not give the names of participants or link to their userpages. Be careful to avoid even the semblance of taking sides in the war.
If you feel that an edit war was truly lame, add it! The lameness of it should speak for itself. Of course, editors with a more experienced eye for lameness may disagree with your claim to the "lamest," which may just result in yet another lame edit war!
Note that the no original research and verifiability policies are meant to apply to the article namespacenot necessarily on pages like this in the Wikipedia project namespace.
This is intended for the community rather than your average readers. Humorous, insightful commentary is encouraged here.
Ethnic and national feuds.The Call Of The Wild Essays, The Call Of The Wild PAPERS, Courseworks, The Call Of The Wild Term Papers, The Call Of The Wild Research Papers and unique The Call Of The Wild papers from metin2sell.com Order plagiarism free custom written essay. All essays are written from scratch by professional writers according to your instructions and.
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 I. The majority of mortals, Paulinus, 1 complain bitterly of the spitefulness of Nature, because we are born for a. - Title: The Call of the Wild Author: Jack London Type of book: Fiction Date Completed: September 12, Summary: The novel, The Call of the Wild, follows a four-year-old mixed Saint Bernard and Scottish shepherd, named Buck.
I couldn't agree more—we need to actively teach students out of using the five-paragraph essay, which is little more than an organizational framework. Call of the wild essay help, - Angles in a triangle homework help. We guarantee that our papers are plagiarism-free.
Each order is handcrafted thoroughly in accordance to your personal preferences and unique requirements.
Expert Reviewed. How to Start a Paragraph.
Seven Methods: Paragraph Template and Sample Paragraphs Starting an Argumentative Paragraph Starting an Introductory Paragraph Starting a Conclusion Paragraph Starting a Paragraph of a Story Using Transitions Between Paragraphs Overcoming Writer's Block Community Q&A A paragraph .